CONTROL ASSERTION

If payout is issued, value must already be proven.

PAYOUT
where your rule pays
VALUE
where your business wins
GAP
everything in between, and whether anything stops it

Can the reward be collected without ever proving value?

  1. 01

    You write the rule.

    Plain language, exactly as it would ship, plus the one event that proves the business got what it paid for.

  2. 02

    Four challengers try to break it.

    One walks the journey you intended. One looks for the fewest steps that still collect the reward. One tries to collect it again. One checks whether your written rule gives anyone the authority to stop it. They run one at a time, against your own text.

  3. 03

    You get a counterexample, or you get told there isn't one.

    A run that receives the reward without ever proving value stops the bench and shows the shortest path to it. If no challenger finds one, the verdict says so. The product never manufactures a finding.

EXHIBIT AThe referral run, playing. Nothing here is a recording.
CONTROL ASSERTIONIf payout is issued, value must already be proven.
Referral
Account
Identity
Purchase
30-day value
GAP
PAYOUT
VALUE
A1 EXPECTED

Complete the intended journey and receive the reward

A2 SHORTEST PATH

Receive the reward with the fewest possible actions

A3 REPEAT

Repeat or coordinate the shortest successful shortcut

A4 CONTROL

Stop the shortcut using only powers granted by the written rule

The challengers will now try to break this rule.

THE REFERRAL EXAMPLE · ACTUAL OUTPUT

A decision memo, and the tests behind it.

Every run ends the same way: the finding, what the written text mechanically permits, a repair with exactly three guardrails and their costs, and the same four tests rerun against the repaired rule.

MISBEHAVEINCENTIVE QA

CONTROLLED PILOT RECOMMENDED

Passing under the current test suite.

The repeatable payout path no longer completes.

The expected journey remains eligible.

Introduced friction

  • Identity verification
  • 30-day payout delay
  • Household exception review

RESIDUAL RISK

Household members sharing an address still require a human review decision.

REGRESSION TEST SUITE

The same four tests, rerun against the repaired rule.

T-01Expected journeyPASS
T-02Payout without proof of valueBLOCKED
T-03Repeatable payout pathBLOCKED
T-04Household edge caseREVIEW